Legal Opinion

Gaston v. AMERICAN TRANSIT INSURANCE COMPANY

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, by denying plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and, as so modified, affirmed.

In this Insurance Law § 3420 action, defendant insurer should not have been collaterally estopped from litigating the issue of whether the car that collided with the bus in which the injured plaintiffs were traveling was insured on the date of the accident. Three prior judgments involving different parties’ claims arising from the same bus accident were submitted to the court. The plaintiffs * proffered two…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Creinis v. Hanover InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Headley v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Headley v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Magic Recovery Medical & Surgical Supply Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API