Legal Opinion
Creinis v. Hanover Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 3, 2009PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*372In an action pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420 (a) (2) to recover an unsatisfied judgment against the defendant’s insured, the defendant appeals from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated January 3, 2006, as denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3124 and 3126 to compel certain discovery or, in the alternative, to preclude the plaintiff from adducing certain evidence at trial, (2) an order of the same court dated March 2, 2006, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the complaint and, in effect, denied its cross motion for summary…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Lang v. Hanover InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Murdza v. ZimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Jefferson Insurance v. Travelers Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Friedman v. Progressive Direct InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Friedman v. Progressive Direct InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Headley v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Headley v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Pollack v. Scottsdale Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016