Legal Opinion

Chatterjee v. Kizer

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1991No. B050632PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPENCER, P. J.

Introduction

Plaintiff Sumita Chatterjee appeals from an order denying her petition for writ of mandate to compel defendant Kenneth Kizer, M.D., as Director of the Department of Health Services, to set aside his order denying her Medi-Cal benefits for the period of September 1985 through September 1986.

Statement of Facts

Plaintiff applied to Los Angeles County (county) for Medi-Cal benefits based on disability on September 19, 1985. The county forwarded her claim to the Disability Evaluation Division (DED) of the State Department of Health Services (department). The DED…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Frink v. ProdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Board of Education v. Jack M.California Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Blumenthal v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Harlow v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The Recorder v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Ruth v. KizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API