United States ex rel. Bower v. Banmiller
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Per curiam
The relator has presented two major issues for the consideration of this court upon his appeal but we find it unnecessary to discuss or dispose of them on the present record. The first issue arises from the fact that an individual was “planted” in the prison in which the relator was confined prior to his trial for the apparent purpose of procuring incriminating statements from him and seemingly was successful in procuring such statements from him. These statements were used against the relator at his trial. See Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States of America Ex Rel. Anthony Russo v. The State of New Jersey and the Principal Keeper of the State Prison Attrenton, New Jersey. United States of America Ex Rel. Frank Bisignano v. The State of New Jersey and the Principal Keeper of the State Prison Attrenton, New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- United States of America Ex Rel. Noah Willis Altizer v. Edward J. Hendrick, Superintendent of Philadelphia County PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. BanmillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965