Legal Opinion

Kuk v. State Farm

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided August 6, 2020No. 1:18-cv-01155Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION JOHN H. KUK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Case No. 18-cv-1155 ) STATE FARM, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is now before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (D. 321). For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, as the claim asserted in the Complaint presents a federal question under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. Venue in this Court is appropriate under…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Henry Ortiz v. Werner Enterprises, IncorporatCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API