Legal Opinion

People v. Cancino

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 19, 1976No. Docket 22499PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

D. E. Holbrook, Jr., P. J.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of delivery of heroin. MCLA 335.341(l)(a); MSA 18.1070(41)(l)(a). He received a sentence of three years probation, the last six months to be spent in the county jail. Defendant appeals as of right.

At both the preliminary examination and the trial the prosecution’s principal witness was the state police undercover narcotics officer who purchased the heroin from the defendant. The substance of the officer’s testimony at both hearings was that while he was on undercover duty in a bar he was approached by the defendant; he asked the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. People v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. TurnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. DukeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. Hughie LewisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. McNealMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. CuellarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. People v. CancinoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API