Legal Opinion

People v. McNeal

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1976No. Docket 23300PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBashara, P. J.

The appellant was convicted of delivery of heroin. MCLA 335.341(l)(a); MSA 18.1070(41)(l)(a). He appeals.

At the close of proofs the trial judge ruled there was no entrapment as a matter of law. He then submitted the issue of entrapment to the jury, on the assumption that to refuse would deprive the appellant of his right to a jury trial.

The first issue raised by appellant is whether the trial judge gave an erroneous instruction on the objective standard of entrapment. However, we perceive the primary issue to be whether the court erred in submitting the question of entrapment to the jury.

In…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. McCrackenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. CuellarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. People v. NievesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. People v. McCrackenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. McNealMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API