Legal Opinion

Young v. Swartz

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1940No. 3279PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HORNBECK, PJ.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of Columbus in favor of the defendant.

*325The action was for property damages by reason of a collision of a car driven by Young with an automobile which it was claimed was negligently driven by Swartz.

The cause was tried to a jury, verdict for defendant and judgment' bn the verdict after motion for new trial was overruled.

Four errors are assigned:(1). The giving before argument of defendant’s special charges 1 and 2.

(21. In admitting in evidence a statement of defendant, Swartz, to his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Slocumb v. WurstOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Willbarger v. Co-Op Cab Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shadwick v. HillsOhio Court of Appeals · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API