Legal Opinion · Dissent

Richard Chapman v. State of Mississippi

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 2015No. 2012-CT-01574-SCTPublished

1DissentRandolph, Presiding Justice

¶ 17. I join Justice Coleman’s dissent in which he finds that Chapman’s third attempt at post-conviction relief is time-barred under the three-year statute of limitations found in Section 99-39-5(2) of the Mississippi Code. I write separately to encourage my fellow justices not to be “manipulated by Chapman’s untimely machinations of the post-conviction-relief process.” Bell v. State, 66 So.3d 90, 95 (Miss.2011) (Randolph, P.J., dissenting).

¶ 18. On January 27, 1982, a jury found Chapman guilty of rape, and the circuit court sentenced him to life imprisonment. A few months later, Chapman…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Rowland v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Rowland v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Chapman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API