Kinealy v. Macklin
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals. Acquired by champerty, plaintiff’s title is invalid. Arden v. Patterson, 5 John.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals. Acquired by champerty, plaintiff’s title is invalid. Arden v. Patterson, 5 John. Ch. 44; Wealcley v. Bell, 13 Ohio 75 ; Webb v. Armstrong, 5 Humphrey, 381 ; Rives v. Weaver, 36 Miss. 383; Barber v. Barber, 14 Wis. 143; Greenman v. Collie, 61 Inch 206 ; Gilbert v. Holmes, 64 111. 556 ; Cardwell v. Bpring, 7 Dana [Ky.] 39 ; Mark v. Jordan, 3 B. Mon. 116 ; Hermann ». Brewster, 7 Bush [Ky.] 355; Crawley v. Vaughan, 11 Bush [Ky.] 517 ; Coughlin v. Railroad, 71 N. Y. 452 ; Vinsent v. Ashley, 5 Humph. [Tenn.] 594 ; Dowell v. Dowell, :3 Head, 504; Barnes v.…
1Opinion of the Court
Nortoít, J.
This suit was instituted in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis to set aside as fraudulent a certain deed executed by defendant conveying to defendant Haydell, in trust for the wife of said Macklin, •certain lots in the city of St. Louis. Judgment was rendered in plaintiff’s favor, which was affirmed by the St. Louis court of appeals, from which judgment defendants have prosecuted their writ of error to this court.
It appears from the record that in 1871, Patrick Macklin, as surety for one Bay, executed a note, payable in six months, to William B. Ferguson as administrator,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tennison v. TennisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- Pawley v. VogelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
- Terry v. WilsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
3Cited by5 opinions
- Manufacturers' Savings Bank v. Big Muddy Iron Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Macklin v. KinealySupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Macklin v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Heineman v. MarshallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Webster v. HardyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914