Legal Opinion

Macklin v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court.— How. J. A. Seddon, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, P. J.

— This is an action of ejectment for the possession of a lot of land and improvements thereon in St. Louis, situated on the north line of Madison street, twenty-three feet front and one hundred and seven feet and six inches deep.

Patrick Macklin, the father of the plaintiff, is the source of title under which plaintiff and defendants claim, so no controversy is made as to his title. The plaintiff claims under a chain of deeds, starting from said Patrick Macklin. The defendants do not deny but what said deeds were made and recorded as they purport to have been. Therefore, under said deeds, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Macklin v. AllenbergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  2. Kinealy v. MacklinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McAboy v. PackerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  2. City of Moberly v. LotterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  3. Macklin v. KinealySupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  4. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. YoungMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API