Legal Opinion

State v. Cusumano

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 2011No. ED 95885PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Rick Cusumano (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for one count of forcible rape, in violation of Section 566.030, RSMo 1986, 1 and one count of forcible sodomy, in violation of Section 566.060, for which he was sentenced to life imprisonment on both counts to be served concurrently. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Petrovic v. Bausch & LombMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CusumanoMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Rick J. Cusumano v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Petrovic v. Bausch & LombMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Cusumano v. GriffithDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
  5. Cusumano v. GriffithDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API