Legal Opinion

State v. Cusumano

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 2013No. ED 98027PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICIA L. COHEN, Judge.

Introduction

Rick Cusumano (Defendant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County convicting him of forcible rape. Defendant contends the trial court plainly erred in: (1) allowing the State to prosecute Defendant for forcible rape in violation of his right to be free of double jeopardy; and (2) overruling Defendant’s objections to the admission of victim impact testimony during the guilt phase of trial. We affirm.

*911 Factual and Procedural Background

At approximately 10:00 p.m. on August 5, 1988, C.Z. (Victim) went for a walk in her neighborhood. As she…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Yeager v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  5. State v. BaumrukSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. A.H. Ex Rel. Hubbard v. Midwest Bus Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  2. Rick J. Cusumano v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Kenneth E. Figgens, Sr. v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Rick J. Cusumano v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Cusumano v. GriffithDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API