Legal Opinion

Witters v. Sowles

United States Circuit Court

Decided April 6, 1887PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

This bank was organized and continued in existence, with a capital stock of S100,000, under the laws of the United States relating to national banks. It failed and stopped doing business April 8, 1884, and was soon after placed in the hands of a receiver. The defendants, except Hall, Edward A. Sowles being president, and Albert Sowles cashier, were directors, with George W. Foster, now deceased, *2after February 11, 1880, and with H. H. Bowman until 1882,, when he died, and with Hall since January 11, 1883. At the time of the failure, there were among the assets of the bank large amounts of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. United States v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Scott v. DepeysterNew York Court of Chancery · 1832

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Paddock v. SiemoneitTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State v. OatsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  3. Wear-Ever Aluminum, Inc. v. TOWNECRAFT, ETC, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  4. In Re Application of BogishNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  5. Rothman v. Harmyl Inn, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API