Legal Opinion
In Re Application of Bogish
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 21, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
69 N.J. Super. 146 (1961)
173 A.2d 906
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ALEXANDER NICHOLAS BOGISH.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided September 21, 1961.
Mr. C. Zachary Seltzer, attorney for petitioner.
Mr. Norman Heine, Camden County Prosecutor (Mr. Stephen M. Gretzkowski, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel), attorney for respondent.
MARTINO, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
Chief Justice Marshall first described the term habeas corpus as a generic term. He said it encompassed, in addition to the great writ (habeas corpus ad subjiciendum for an inquiry into the cause of restraint),…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ex Parte Bollman and SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1807
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Commonwealth v. CzajkowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- In Re GarofoneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- State v. MpetasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- State v. HayeckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.