Steenstrup v. Toledo Foundry & Machine Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered March 22, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, after a trial before the court without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
This is an action to recover the sum of $1,123.15, paid by the plaintiff for freight charges upon a steam shovel which was shipped from Toledo, Ohio, to Seattle, in pursuance of a contract for the sale thereof from the defendant to the plaintiff. A trial resulted in findings and judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and against the defendant for that sum. The defendant has appealed.
It is first contended that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for a continuance of the trial. Appellant is a corporation of Toledo, Ohio. This action was commenced in May, 1910. The trial was set for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Springfield Shingle Co. v. Edgecomb Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Walters v. FieldWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Hodges v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Calhoun v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matson v. Kennecott Mines Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
- Zarelli v. Superior Distributing Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
- Van Cott v. WallUtah Supreme Court · 1918
- Pool v. RiegalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Elliott v. Toledo Foundry & Machine Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911