Legal Opinion

Walters v. Field

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1902No. 4295PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Whitman County. — Hon. Stephen J. Chadwick, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered hy

White, J.

On the 9th of December, 1899, the respondent, as plaintiff, commenced an action in the superior court of Whitman county against R. H. Field and C. C ITensley, as defendants, to recover a judgment o-u a promissory note for1 $800 and interest, which note was payable to the order of the plaintiff, and signed hy the defendants under the firm name of Field & Hensley. On the same day an affidavit for a writ of attachment was madei, and the affidavit stated that O. O. Hensley was not a resident of the state of Washington, etc. On the same day a writ…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Woodbury v. HenningsenWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Upper Mississippi Transportation Co. v. WhittakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Remington Cash Register Co. v. National Cash Register Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1925
  2. Matson v. Kennecott Mines Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Matson v. Kennecott Mines Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Zarelli v. Superior Distributing Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Larsen v. Allan Line Steamship Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API