Legal Opinion

Jamison v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1953No. L. A. 22087Published

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Chance Jamison, respondent here, petitioned for probate of the holographic will, * dated December 31, 1949, of Arthur C. Jamison, his father. California Trust Com pany petitioned for the probate of a witnessed will of the decedent, dated May 17, 1948. Frances Johnson, decedent’s daughter, for herself and her two minor children; Leanore Patterson, another daughter of the decedent, her children, and Katharine Jamison, the divorced wife of respondent, filed oppositions to the probate of the holographic will. Louise Jami-son, surviving widow of decedent, did not oppose it. Under the 1948 will,…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. In re Estate of McDevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Estate of LingenfelterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Arais v. KalensnikoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API