Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nikolaus v. Gasiorowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 8, 1979Published

1Dissent

Mahoney, P. J., and Main, J., dissent and vote to reverse in the following memorandum by Mahoney, P. J. Mahoney, P. J. (dissenting).

We cannot

agree with the majority that the stenographically transcribed stipulation of discontinuance which concluded the action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien and obligated the defendant to pay plaintiff the sum of $2,760 upon the completion by defendant of foundation work at the construction site, somehow became a "mere arrangement requiring further performance by both parties, and their stipulation of settlement was not intended to conclude the action”. A…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Teitelbaum Holdings, Ltd. v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Yonkers Fur Dressing Co. v. Royal InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Sperb v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Hallock v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API