Keene v. Willis
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtBarney, J.
This case proceeded on the theory that, given a covenant to repair by the landlord, a breach entitled the tenant to recover consequential damages. Not only was this issue so charged by the trial court without objection, but the briefs and argument before this Court assumed this view of the law. Thus, as between these litigants, for purposes of review, it became the law of the case. General Electric Credit Corp. v. White, 126 Vt. 149, 151, 225 A.2d 58. Moreover, this is the theory advanced by the Restatement (Second) of Torts, sec. 357, (1965), as the one sound in concept and to be preferred,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Reitmeyer v. SprecherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Sacks v. PleasantCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Pond v. CarterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
- Beaucage v. RussellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1968
- Banker v. DodgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hilder v. St. PeterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- Claude G. Dern Electric, Inc. v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- Stannard v. HarrisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
- Hopkins v. GoetzSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- Villa v. HeilmannSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.