Zenns v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for defendant Sentry because plaintiff Quinby’s policy with defendant Sentry remained in effect at the time the accident occurred. We disagree.
G.S. 20-310 (1989) provides:(f) No cancellation or refusal to renew by an insurer of a policy of automobile insurance shall be effective unless the insurer shall have given the policyholder notice at his last known post-office address by certificate of mailing a written notice of the cancellation or refusal to renew. Such notice shall:(1) Be approved as to form by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pearson v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. CottenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Choice Floor Covering Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993