Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Cotten

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1971No. 145PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAKE, Justice.

G.S. 20-309 (e), which is part of The Vehicle Financial Responsibility Act of 1957, prior to the amendment of 1971, which has no effect upon this action, provided:

“(e) No insurance policy provided [sic] in subsection (d) [i.e., any policy providing liability insurance with regard to a motor vehicle] may be terminated by cancellation or otherwise by the insurer without having given the North Carolina Motor Vehicles Department notice of such cancellation fifteen (15) days prior to effective date of cancellation. Where the insurance policy is terminated by the insured the insurer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Faizan v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Harrelson Ex Rel. Randolph v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Perkins v. American Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Allstate Insurance Company v. HaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Nixon v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pearson v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Anthony v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  4. Allstate Insurance v. McCraeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. J.M.P.H. Wetherell v. Sentry Reinsurance, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API