Legal Opinion

United States v. Boyd James O'DOnnell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 20, 1976No. 76-1003PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before WALLACE and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and FERGUSON, * District Judge. SNEED, Circuit Judge:

Appellant O’Donnell appeals the district court’s judgment which convicted him upon his plea of guilty of violating Title 18, U.S.C. § 152 1 (knowingly and fraudulently making a false oath in relation to material matters in a bankruptcy proceeding) as charged in Count XI of the indictment. Our jurisdiction rests on 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

In this appeal O’Donnell contends: (1) his plea of guilty did not conform with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure; (2) he was denied his…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. In Re Seymour Chalik, Debtor. Seymour Chalik v. Harold D. Moorefield, Jr., TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Anderson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Village of Montpelier v. GreenoOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Jose Rosado Acha v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,971 United States of America v. Vernon Robert Lindholm, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API