Legal Opinion
(HC) Klippenstein v. Fraunheim
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 19, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00086Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RANDY SCOTT KLIPPENSTEIN, No. 2:21-cv-00086 KJM GGH P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SCOTT FRAUNHEIM, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 Introduction and Summary 19 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed an application for a writ 20 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to the United States 21 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 626(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. 22 Petitioner was convicted of forcible acts of sexual misconduct,…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.