Legal Opinion

DOCKERY v. HERETICK

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 1, 2021No. 2:17-cv-04114Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Dockery : : CIVIL ACTION v. : : No. 17-4114 Heretick, et al. : : Kenney, J. Memorandum I. INTRODUCTION In this civil RICO case, plaintiff Larry G. Dockery alleges the existence of an unlawful scheme between companies who purchase future structured settlement annuity payments, an attorney who represented those companies in connection with such transactions, and other persons to obtain structured settlement payments from unsophisticated beneficiaries on unfair terms. See ECF No. 99, Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”).…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API