Stokes v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, J.
Case Summary
Thomas Stokes appeals his conviction and sentence for carrying a handgun without a license. The trial court did not err in admitting an unsolicited statement that Stokes made to his sister because the statement was not a product of unreasonable police force. Additionally, we find that the evidence is sufficient to support Stokes' conviction because an officer testified that he observed a handgun fall from Stokes' waistband. Because prior conviec-tions are exempted from Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2581, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), reh'g denied, the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. MatthewsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- McDermott v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Michael P. McCoy v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. MatthewsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Robeson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005