Legal Opinion

People v. Matthews

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 19, 2005No. 1-04-1656PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gordon

Defendant, Johnny Matthews, appeals from his conviction after a bench trial of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. He contends that he must receive a new trial because his trial attorney stipulated to the identity and amount of controlled substances recovered by the police without any expression in the record of his assent, and that counsel’s agreement to stipulate was so unreasonable as to amount to ineffective assistance of counsel. Defendant further appeals his sentence claiming that the sequence of his prior convictions was required to be proven beyond a…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. LaCountWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  2. People v. BrooksAppellate Court of Illinois · 2023
  3. People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. State v. HegglandHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  5. People v. HibblerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API