Lowenstein v. Johnston
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Certioiari; from Fulton superior court—Judge Bell. March 26 1918.
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.
1. The testimony was sufficient to authorize the finding that a notice of dissolution of partnership, such as would relieve the defendant from liability on the claim sued on, had been sent to and was received by the plaintiff. While the mailing of such a notice, properly stamped and directéd, raises a presumption only of its receipt (Bush v. McCarty Co., 127 Ga. 308, 311, 312, 56 S. E. 430, 9 Ann. Cas. 240), and while this presumption may be entirely overcome by the undisputed evidence of the addressee that the letter' was never received (Hamilton v. Stewart, 108 Ga. 472, 476, 34 S. E. 123;…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hamilton & Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Bush & Hattaway v. McCarty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Callaway v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Fouché & Fouché v. MorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Cassel v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rawleigh Medical Co. v. BurneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Brazell v. HearnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- E. Frederics Inc. v. Felton Beauty Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Deep v. DevaneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.