Legal Opinion
Control Screening LLC v. Technological Application & Production Co. (Tecapro), HCMC-Vietnam
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 26, 2012No. 11-2896PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
This dispute involves New Jersey-based Control Screening, LLC and Vietnam- based Technological Application and Production Company, HCMC-Vietnam (“Tecapro”). Control Screening and Tecapro disagree about the proper interpretation of an arbitration forum selection clause in their contract. The District Court granted Control Screening’s motion and petition to compel arbitration in New Jersey, and Tecapro appealed.
I
Control Screening manufactures and sells X-ray and metal detection devices for use in public facilities around the world. Tecapro is a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Nicini v. MorraCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Milad Allaham v. Fadi NaddafCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Abigail Bacon v. Avis Budget Group IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Johnson v. Orkin, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Richard Ackourey, Jr. v. Sonellas Custom TailorsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Henry Kalama v. Matson Navigation Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.