In Re Frankel
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Dissent
William J. Bkehnast, Jr., J.
(dissenting). I differ with the majority only in that I think disbarment of the respondent is the single appropriate discipline in the circumstances in this case.
I
The proceeding had its origin in a letter dated October 17, 1953 from Edward W. Wise, Jr., Esq., a member of the Monmouth County Bar, to the Administrative Director of the Courts. The letter detailed the activities of the photographer Low but did not mention respondent or any other lawyer “because (said Mr. Wise) I am not sure the attorneys involved fully realize what this man is doing.”
The court on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of BeakleyWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Chreste v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Chreste v. Louisville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Chreste v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.