Legal Opinion
Barmag Barmer Maschinenfa-Brik AG v. Murata Machinery, Ltd.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided March 17, 1983No. C-C-81-151-MPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
McMILLAN, District Judge.
On April 10, 1981, plaintiff Barmag filed this suit, alleging that defendants Murata and Murata of America infringed and induced others to infringe plaintiff’s letters Patent No. Re. 30,159 by marketing, sales, demonstration, and servicing activities in this district with respect to a false twist textile crimping machine covered by the patent,
On November 12,1983, defendants moved for summary judgment on the ground that the patent was invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) because the patented assembly was “on sale” in this country more than…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Delong Corporation v. Raymond International, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Timely Products Corporation, Raphael J. Costanzo v. Stanley ArronCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Anthony J. Cali v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Application of Frederick C. FosterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984