Winona & Warsaw Railway Co. v. Rousseau
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Elldiart Superior Court; V. W. VanFleet, Judge. Action by Mary Rousseau against tbe Winona and Warsaw Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion
On Petition for Rehearing.
Hotter, J.
Counsel for appellant in their petition for a rehearing urge, with much earnestness, that the court failed to consider in the original opinion some questions that they deem vital and controlling. We therefore supplement that opinion with a consideration of those questions.
9. Counsel first insist that neither of the several paragraphs of complaint states sufficient facts. The only objection urged in the petition for rehearing is that said paragraphs do not allege “that the place at which appellee *254desired to alight was a usual stopping place on appellant’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. SheeksIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Claypool v. WigmoreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SchmidtIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.