Legal Opinion

Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd. v. Beebe

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided March 6, 2006No. Civ. 05-5051PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HENDREN, District Judge.

Now on this 6th day of March, 2006, comes on for consideration Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss (document # 12), and from said motion, and the response thereto, the Court finds and orders as follows:

1. Plaintiffs seek to permanently enjoin enforcement of an Arkansas statute, A.C.A. § 26-57-261, referred to herein as the Allocable Share Amendment or the Amendment. They claim that the Amendment violates the Sherman Act; Article 2, § 19 of the Arkansas Constitution; the First Amendment of the United States Constitution; Article 2, § 4 and § 6, of the Arkansas…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grand River Enterprise Six Nations, Ltd. v. PryorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  2. Kt & G Corp. v. ATTORNEY GEN. OF STATE OF OKLAHOMACourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Edmondson v. Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
  4. GRAND RIVER ENTERPRISES SIX NATIONS, LTD. v. KingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  5. Grand River Enterprise Six Nations, Ltd. v. William PryorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API