Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd. v. Beebe
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HENDREN, District Judge.
Now on this 6th day of March, 2006, comes on for consideration Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss (document # 12), and from said motion, and the response thereto, the Court finds and orders as follows:
1. Plaintiffs seek to permanently enjoin enforcement of an Arkansas statute, A.C.A. § 26-57-261, referred to herein as the Allocable Share Amendment or the Amendment. They claim that the Amendment violates the Sherman Act; Article 2, § 19 of the Arkansas Constitution; the First Amendment of the United States Constitution; Article 2, § 4 and § 6, of the Arkansas…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grand River Enterprise Six Nations, Ltd. v. PryorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Kt & G Corp. v. ATTORNEY GEN. OF STATE OF OKLAHOMACourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- State ex rel. Edmondson v. Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- GRAND RIVER ENTERPRISES SIX NATIONS, LTD. v. KingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Grand River Enterprise Six Nations, Ltd. v. William PryorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007