Legal Opinion

Enzor v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1936No. 4 Div. 136PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, Judge.

The defendant in this case was at the time of the alleged embezzlement the clerk of the circuit court of Pike county, and, as such, was, as fixed by statute, ex officio clerk of the county court. Of this fact and his duties as such officer, the courts take judicial notice. Corbin v. State, 15 Ala.App. 602, 74 So. 729; 12 Alabama and 'Southern Digest, Evidence, ^ 44.

The defendant, as clerk aforesaid, rendered to the state board of administration itemized accounts of several criminal cases, where the defendant had been convicted of misdemeanors in the county court of Pike county…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Booth v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State v. McFetridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Wall v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Allibone v. AmesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Southern Hardware & Supply Co. v. LesterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Troup v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Edgil v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Killough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Hinds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  5. Esdale v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API