McBride & Co. v. Macon Telegraph Publishing Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action on contract. Before Judge Felton. Bibb superior court. April term, 1896.
1Opinion of the CourtFish, J.
1. In a set of interrogatories sued out by the *423plaintiffs in error, the witness, after being specifically interrogated with regard to various matters, was asked to “.State all the facts, as fully as if especially interrogated with reference thereto, that will enure to the benefit of the plaintiff or the defendant in this case.” Strictly speaking, this was not an interrogatory at all, but a mere request or demand for general information in addition to that sought to be elicited by the preceding specific questions propounded to the witness. We can not approve of this method of examination, as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wood v. Cincinnati Safe & Lock Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Bostwick v. Duncan, Johnston & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1878
- Chapman & Son v. Atlanta Guano Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Angier v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
- Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
3Cited by30 opinions
- Livingston v. BarnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Tinsley v. Gullett Gin Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Green v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Walton Guano Co. v. CopelanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.