Legal Opinion

In the Matter of the Tax Liabilities of John Does, Members of the Columbus Trade Exchange in the Years 1977 and 1978 United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 3, 1982No. 80-3584PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

This case requires us to consider the circumstances under which the Internal Revenue Service may seek to ascertain the identities of unknown taxpayers through the issuance of “John Doe” summonses. A “John Doe” summons is, in essence, a direction to a third party to surrender information concerning taxpayers whose identity is currently unknown to the IRS.

Until 1976, there was no statutory restraint on the Commissioner’s use of this device. However, as part of the Tax Reform Act of 1976, Congress added to the Code § 7609(f) and (h), entitled “Special Procedures for Third Party Summonses.” 26…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. BiscegliaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States of America and Gerald R. Potocnak, Revenue Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Pittsburgh Trade Exchange Inc. And Vincent E. ManellaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Tiffany Fine Arts, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. Samuels, Kramer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Samuels, Kramer And CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. KerstingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Agricultural Asset Management Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API