Legal Opinion

Tiffany Fine Arts, Inc. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 9, 1985No. 83-1007PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall

The question presented in this case is whether the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) must comply with the “John Doe” summons procedures of § 7609(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U. S. C. § 7609(f), when it serves a summons on a named taxpayer for the dual purpose of investigating both the tax liability of that taxpayer and the tax liabilities of other, unnamed parties.

I

Petitioner Tiffany Fine Arts, Inc., is a holding company for various subsidiaries that promote tax shelters. On October 6,1981, Revenue Agent Joel Lewis issued four summonses to Tiffany, pursuant to 26 U. S. C. §…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Rogers v. LodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. Arthur Young & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. BiscegliaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert W. Ritchie, Personally and in His Capacity as a Partner/officer of Ritchie, Fels & Dillard, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Seneca Resources Corp. v. Township of HighlandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  4. In re Criminal Investigation, 7th District Court No. CS-1Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. United States v. Nancy Gertner, Etc., John Doe, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API