Legal Opinion

Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. v. Stanley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 29, 1962No. 39351Published

1Dissent

BLACKBIRD, Vice Chief Justice

(dissenting).

I cannot concur in the majority opinion. It recognizes the proper rule governing the interpretation or construction of verdicts, but applies it incorrectly, with the result that an injustice is done. That rule, as stated in the California Case of Brokaw v. *858Black-Foxe Military Institute, cited therein, is reflected in the following excerpt from that Court’s opinion:

“It may occur, as it did here, that in an action against several defendants, including a master and his servant, the jury may return a verdict against the master and remain silent as to the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. J. M. Hamilton & Co. v. PrescottTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Humphrey v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  5. Irelan-Yuba Gold Quartz Mining Co. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1941

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API