Legal Opinion
Biasetti v. City of Stamford
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 24, 2010No. AC 30867PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARPER, J.
The plaintiff in this workers’ compensation matter, William Biasetti, appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) dismissing his claim for benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act (act), General Statutes § 31-275 et seq. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that (1) the board improperly interpreted the phrase “arises from” in General Statutes (Rev. to 2005) § 31-275 (16) (B) (ii) to require a causal connection between his physical injuries and his post-traumatic…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marandino v. Prometheus PharmacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Six v. Thomas O'Connor & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Gartrell v. Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Driscoll v. General Nutrition Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Civardi v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ayna v. graebel/ct Movers, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Buchanan v. East HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
- Biasetti v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Biasetti v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010