Legal Opinion
Suhr v. City of Scribner
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided August 8, 1980No. 42939PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.
Plaintiff filed this action against the city of Scribner seeking damages for what he termed the unlawful termination by the defendant of a contract employing plaintiff to operate a city dump. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs petition, claiming that Suhr v. City of Scribner, 202 Neb. 364, 275 N.W.2d 596 (1979) (Suhr No. 1), was res judicata as to the present action. The District Court agreed and sustained the motion. The plaintiff has appealed, asserting that the subject of this lawsuit is not the same cause of action as was litigated in Suhr No. 1. We agree and reverse…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vantage Enterprises, Inc. v. CaldwellNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
- Boomer v. OlsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- City of Alliance v. Cover-Jones Motor Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1951
- Gayer v. H. W. Parker & SonNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- Schuyler National Bank v. BollongNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Eicher v. Mid America Financial Investment Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Millman v. County of ButlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- Cockle v. CockleNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- Northport Irrigation District v. JessNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- AGP Grain Cooperative v. White (In Re White)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.