Legal Opinion

(PC) Ward v. County of Sacramento

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 3, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00158Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ELTON WARD, No. 2:24-cv-0158 AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a county inmate who filed this civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

18 without a lawyer. Pending before the court are plaintiff’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis, 19 expedite ruling on the cognizable claims, and amend the complaint, as well as screening of the 20 first amended complaint (“FAC”). 1 ECF Nos. 2, 7-9. 21 I. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 22…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API