Legal Opinion

Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Neidlinger

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 3, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Seabrook. Effingham superior court. May term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.

A railroad company is not liable for an injury simply because, at the time it was occasioned, the train causing the same was being operated in a manner forbidden by law. To make the company liable, the failure to properly conduct the train must have operated as a cause of the injury. Western & Atlantic R. R. Co. v. Main, 64 Ga. 649. Accordingly, when, in the trial of an action to recover damages for killing a cow, proof is made that the train was passing through a town at a speed of twenty miles an hour or more, and that such speed was not checked in approaching a crossing, and it did not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Prather v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  2. Ivy v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  3. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. MainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  4. Martin v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Huckabee v. GraceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. DugganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API