Legal Opinion

State v. Pickens

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 25, 2011No. ED 93494PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Judge.

Courts are no strangers to tragedy. But, in this case, we must recount crimes that are almost beyond our imagining. After hearing evidence from forty-eight witnesses over four days, a jury convicted the defendant, Judy Pickens, of killing her young son and poisoning her young daughter by giving them the drug Clonidine. 1 Yet the defendant complains on appeal only about the testimony of a single witness. At trial, the State called Dr. Michael Armour, a forensic psychologist, who testified about “factitious disorder by proxy,” a mental disorder also known as…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. State v. BaumrukSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. State v. ShurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. State v. IsaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. PattonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. RayMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. CochranMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State v. WadlowMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. RogersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API