Legal Opinion
Mohawk Valley Water Authority v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 12, 2010No. Appeal No. 2Published
1Opinion of the Court
*1514Appeals and cross appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Samuel D. Hester, J.), entered May 28, 2009. The order and judgment, inter alia, declared that plaintiff has the right to divert the Hinckley Reservoir water flow at a rate not to exceed 35 cubic feet per second.
It is hereby ordered that the order and judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying that part of plaintiffs cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the first counterclaim of defendants State of New York and New York State Canal Corporation and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ciesinski v. Town of AuroraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Niagara Falls Power Co. v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Alicea v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- IMS Engineers-Architects, P.C. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Cadlerock, L.L.C. v. RennerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.