Legal Opinion

San Jos&201 Fruit Packing Co. v. Cutting

California Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1901No. S.F. No. 1760PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The plaintiff, before and after September 19, 1893, was engaged in the business of canning fruit, and of manufacturing metal cans for its own use and for sale, and owned and operated in its business a machine known as the “ Wheaton header,” used for putting heads on cans. At the date named, in a suit against plaintiff then pending, an injunction was issued, restraining plaintiff from using this machine, which injunction continued in force until April 17,1896, when it was dissolved. The defendant here was surety on the injunction bond, and the suit was brought against him for damages…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moore v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. White v. DelanoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  3. Phoenix Pad Co. v. United States Ex Rel. the American Coat & Pad Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API