Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 10, 1982No. 80 C 5986PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BUA, District Judge.
Presently before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing Count II of plaintiff’s action. An introduction of sorts is necessary before the merits of defendant’s motion can be addressed.
This lawsuit represents the most recent stage of a dispute between the named parties that has been in the process of litigation since 1976. Although the cause now before the court is an action separate from the initial lawsuit, the present suit is intimately related to the former, and therefore, the history of the earlier action must be related here.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- In Re Multidistrict Vehicle Air Pollution M.D.L. No. 31. State of California v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., Robert Morgan v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., City of Philadelphia v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., State of New York v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., City of New York v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., City and County of Denver v. American Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Kearney & Trecker Corporation v. Giddings & Lewis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Sitkin Smelting & Refining Co. v. FMC Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Peter M. Roberts, Cross-Appellee v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, a Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. William Ranney, United States of America v. Dennis CioffiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Southern Pacific Communications Co. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983