Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Eastman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 4, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of contract, to recover the balance due on a promissory note. The defendant pleaded a discharge in bankruptcy in March, 1913. There was a trial before a judge of the Superior Court with a jury. At the close of the evidence, counsel agreed that no facts were in dispute; and the defendant’s counsel statéd, in reply to an inquiry from the trial judge, that he was not prepared to show that the plaintiff had had notice of the bankruptcy proceedings.

The defendant introduced in evidence a certificate of the District Court of the United States for the district of Massachusetts,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hill v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Birkett v. Columbia BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Kreitlein v. FergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Smith v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  5. Wylie v. MarinofskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Short v. FarmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  2. Bucci v. LaRoccaAtlantic County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1943
  3. Scott v. East Cambridge Savings BankMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1965
  4. State v. DuncanConnecticut Superior Court · 1981
  5. State v. DuncanConnecticut Superior Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API