Legal Opinion

METZE v. Meetze

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 8, 1957No. 17281PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stukes, Chief Justice.

This action is concerned with a boundary dispute between respondents and appellant. They have a common source ol title. In 1927 one Huffstettler conveyed to appellant, who was his son-in-law, a lot of land measuring and fronting 90 feet on the Columbia-Newberry Highway and running back to a depth of 400. feet, being a parallelogram. It was bounded on both sides and on the rear by other land of the grantor. In 1953 Huffstettler conveyed the land on the north side of the aforementioned lot to his daughter, the mother of respondents, who subsequently conveyed to them.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knight v. HiltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  2. Uxbridge Co. v. PoppenheimSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. McRae v. HamerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  4. Harrison v. LanowaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  5. Little v. LITTLESupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pioneer Mill Co., Ltd. v. DowHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Chastain v. Owens Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Eargle v. MoakSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  4. Johnson v. RolandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  5. Rush v. ThigpenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API