Legal Opinion
Hammett v. Sherman
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 7, 2021No. 3:19-cv-00605Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAURA LYNN HAMMETT, an Case No.: 19-CV-605 TWR (AHG) individual, 12 ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO Plaintiff, 13 DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION v. TO CLARIFY ORDER 14 MARY E. SHERMAN, an individual, et 15 al., (ECF Nos. 162, 164, 166, 167, 215) 16 Defendants. 17 18 The several Defendants have moved to dismiss Plaintiff Laura Hammett’s Second 19 Amended Complaint. (ECF Nos. 162, 164, 166, 167.) Plaintiff opposes. (ECF No. 194.) 20 In addition, Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Clarify an Order issued by the Ninth Circuit…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.