Legal Opinion

Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Scottsdale

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 6, 1994No. 1 CA-CV 92-0210PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERG, Judge. '

The City of Scottsdale appeals from a trial court ruling that Scottsdale Ordinance 1940, imposing a water resource development fee upon new developments, violates Ariz.Rev. Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) section 9-463.05. Because we hold that a municipality’s factual determination should be upheld unless clearly erroneous, arbitrary, and wholly unwarranted, we reverse the trial court and, for other reasons discussed below, remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 1980, the Arizona Legislature passed the Groundwater Management…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Kelley v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Jordan v. Village of Menomonee FallsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Pioneer Trust & Savings Bank v. Village of Mount ProspectIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Fluckey v. City of PlymouthMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Home Builders Ass'n v. City of ScottsdaleArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  2. HOME BUILDERS ASS'N v. City of MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Apache JunctionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. Home Builders Ass'n v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  5. HBA OF CENT. ARIZONA v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API